![]() ![]() ![]() Validation geometry and 203: - 195 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 (a and 205: Eddy Current Losses per Sheet Pcl i and 207: can be helpful to develop an approp and 209: to calculate the current. ![]() Illustration of the mapping and 199: transient 3-D finite element simula and 201: (a) (b) Fig. Moreover, Fig and 183: - 175 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 In and 185:, and 187: 4) The pulse generator: The pulse g and 189: - 181 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 An and 191: 9.įor (11) we apply nodal finite and 193: In the area of the central diagonal and 195: - 187 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 Fi and 197: Fig. ![]() Results from ACGA It is not prac and 175: IGTE Symposium, TU Graz 2012 - 167 and 177: IGTE Symposium, TU Graz 2012 cavity and 179: - 171 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 Op and 181: minimize the area A2. The value is optimized and 161: which describes the three dimension and 163: ampere-turn method, gives closer ap and 165: Figure 6: 2-D model of analyzed tra and 167: Figure 18 Total deformations at -15 and 169: predict the worst performance of th and 171: design subject to small variations and 173: C. Variation of the Poisson ration and 159: modulus Ex. MSE Hysteresi and 145: - 137 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 Fa and 147: unknown distribution of surface cha and 149: where Grr (, ) is the kernel for m and 151: 4 2 h cos QrRh (, ) 30sin and 153: II.ĮXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS (EM and 155: Comparing the FRFs depicted in Fig. A control and 79: of accuracy of the approximation H and 81: - 73 - 15th IGTE Symposium 2012 Qua and 83: charges per unit length along bound and 85: error of the characteristic impedan and 87: Figure 3: Diagram summarizing the d and 89: Formally, the problem is expressed and 91: Figure 10: The increase of winding and 93: 4) (k) is calculated using the and 95: until HFP becomes near to zero. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |